Home‎ > ‎Adrian Price‎ > ‎

Public health risks of proposed 5G rollout in Worthing and West Sussex

 I am writing as you are a Resident in the Worthing West Constituency, to ask for your help with a campaign being run by the Stop 5G in Worthing group. We are encouraging local electors to write to their elected government representatives in order to raise awareness of the grave public health threats posed by the proposed rollout of 5G wireless communication technology throughout the United Kingdom.


Following this covering message is a template letter that we are suggesting constituents could send to their elected representatives. If you are able to spare the time to read it and the attached leaflet and maybe watch some of the 5G Crisis Summit documentaries, and having done so feel concerned and wish to help, it would be most effective if you could please:

  • send the above message individually to each of your elected local borough and county councillors, MP and MEPs as detailed below;
  • select the text below the horizontal line at the end of this covering message then copy (Ctrl+C) and paste (Ctrl+V) it into a new e-mail (don’t just forward this message), using HTML format not plain text (otherwise the links won’t render);
  • delete all inapplicable [options] in the salutation and first paragraph and substitute all the <place-holders> with the relevant details;
  • include the attached PDF leaflet as an attachment to your own messages;
  • it would help to include me in the BCC list when you send the e-mails to your councillors (optional);
  • note that it is important the message bears your address and postcode, as elected representatives only respond to people in their own area;
  • it is useful to include your ‘phone number(s) (optional);
  • it would help to let me know that you have sent messages and subsequently if you receive any substantive response, as it will be useful to the Campaign to track the position of each representative;
  • we plan to have messages sent to all elected representatives by 31st October 2019.


As mentioned in the message below, my website campaign-resources.org has links to additional information resources on the Wi-Fi & 5G page.


Elected Members for the Worthing Area


European Parliament

South East England Region

Nigel Farage (Brexit); e-mail: nigel.farage@europarl.europa.eu

Catherine Bearder (LibDem); e-mail: catherine.bearder@europarl.europa.eu

Alexandra Lesley Phillips (Brexit); e-mail: alexandra-lesley.phillips@europarl.europa.eu

Alexandra Louise Rosenfield Phillips (Green); e-mail: alexandra-louise.phillips@europarl.europa.eu

Antony Hook (LibDem); e-mail: antony.hook@europarl.europa.eu

Robert Rowland (Brexit); e-mail: robert.rowland@europarl.europa.eu

Daniel Hannan (Con); e-mail: daniel.hannan@europarl.europa.eu

Belinda De Lucy (Brexit); e-mail: belinda.delucy@europarl.europa.eu

Judith Bunting (LibDem); e-mail: judith.bunting@europarl.europa.eu

John Howarth (Lab); e-mail: contact@johnhowarthmep.uk


Central Government

Worthing West Constituency

Sir Peter Bottomley MP (Con); e-mail: mbottomleyp@parliament.uk


West Sussex County Council


Worthing Borough Council


Please feel free to call me at the number below if you would like to discuss this campaign. If you would prefer not to participate or receive any further communications on this or other topics, please reply to this e-mail stating so.

 With gratitude in anticipation of your help,


Yours sincerely,

 Adrian Price

Truth Activist–Software Engineer–etc.

   (01903) 206641

phone-mobile-16(07958) 628630



“tenax propositi ulteriora peto”

“qui tacet consentire videtur”


Dear [Councillor (DELETE AS APPROPRIATE)] <representative-name>,


I am a resident of [the South East England Region | Worthing West Constituency | <division> County Division | <ward-name> Borough Council Ward (DELETE AS APPROPRIATE)] and I write on behalf of the Stop 5G in Worthing group to express concern about the future rollout of 5G communications technology in Worthing and elsewhere in West Sussex.


The Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) and Public Health England’s (PHE’s) Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards (CRCE) assure us that their safety standards are rigorous and trustworthy and that 5G technology is completely safe with regard to potential impacts on human health and the environment. However, extensive investigation reveals that:

  • There are thousands of peer-reviewed scientific studies published over many decades, that establish an irrefutable litany of deleterious biological effects of microwave radiation in the 800MHz – 300GHz frequency range. [1]
  • Among the serious effects noted are: brain tumours, gliomas and other cancers [2], headaches [3], insomnia [4], cognitive impairment [5], neurological and neuro-developmental disorders [6], ovum abnormalities [7], impaired sperm motility, quality and morphology [8]heritable single- and double-strand DNA damage [9], oxidative tissue damage [10], blood cell damage [11], cardiac stress [12], skin diseases [13], eye lens opacity [14], damage to plants and animals especially insects and pollinators [15], amongst many other effects.
  • The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) safety standards referenced by Government regulators are based on an out of date, inadequate and discredited understanding of the many complex interactions between non-ionising electromagnetic radiation and living organisms [16]. ICNIRP’s so-called ‘safety’ levels are several orders of magnitude higher than those known to cause serious problems [17].
  • The regulatory bodies have been captured by the multi-trillion dollar telecommunications industry and now serve industry interests not those of public health [18].
  • No safety research or monitoring is planned for the existing UK 5G pilots, a total abandonment the Precautionary Principle.
  • Major insurers such as Lloyds of London and Swiss Re refuse to insure against 5G health liabilities [19].
  • global coalition of hundreds of eminent scientists has called for a moratorium on 5G rollout, pending proper safety research.[20]
  • Several states, cities and towns in the UK, Europe and elsewhere have already implemented such a moratorium.[21]
  • The Council of Europe’s Resolution 1815 of April 2011 expressed a unanimous vote to ban Wi-Fi and mobile ‘phones from schools and to prioritise reduction of human exposure to all sources of EM radiation[22]
  • Some locations where 5G has already been rolled out are monitoring or already reporting health issues.[23]


According to prominent EMF researcher Dr Martin L Pall PhD (Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State University):

“Putting in tens of millions of 5G antennae without a single biological test of safety has got to be about the stupidest idea anyone has had in the history of the world.” [emphasis added][24]


We have here the makings of a 21st Century public health and environmental catastrophe compared to which tobacco, DDT, asbestos and opioids will pale into insignificance.


I have attached a PDF format leaflet that highlights the main concerns, printed copies of which are available on request. For further information please refer to the links on the Campaign Resources website (top menu > Campaigns > Wi-Fi & 5G > References). See also the excellent 5G Crisis Summit video documentary set hosted on the media page of the Campaign Resources website – particularly recommended are:


In the light of all this, I am deeply concerned that central Government has ruled that local planning authorities may not take health or environmental concerns into account when considering 5G-related planning applications. This is extraordinary, since it conflicts directly with a Planning Authority’s legal obligation to protect the health and wellbeing of the population in their area, especially children. It conflicts with Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights[25]. It conflicts with the legal principle that Government signatories to a contract bear ultimate responsibility and liability for public health and other outcomes. Elected representatives such as yourself also bear a personal responsibility for protecting the health and safety of those whom they represent, which cannot lawfully  be negated by adopting a position of wilful ignorance.


I am hoping that you will undertake to:

  • study this important topic
  • discuss it with your elected colleagues
  • raise the matter in the appropriate committee(s)


I look forward to hearing from you.


Yours sincerely,










Here are some sample references on biological effects of electromagnetic radiation; there are many others.


[1] EMF Portal: https://www.emf-portal.org/en


[2] Brain tumours & other cancers: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24064953




[3] Headaches: https://bmcneurol.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1471-2377-11-115





[4] Insomnia: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15195201


[5] Cognitive impairment: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28866028




[6] Neuropsychiatric effects: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300312


[7] Ovum abnormalities: https://www.emf-portal.org/en/article/17603


[8] Sperm quality, motility, morphology: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110569017300602




[9] DNA damage: https://www.emf-portal.org/en/article/29287




[10] Oxidative stress: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2047487317734898


[11] Blood cell damage: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15368378.2017.1350584


[12] Cardiac stress: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2047487317734898


[13] Effects on skin: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8016593


[14] Effects on eyes: https://www.emf-portal.org/en/article/17429



[15] Effects on insects and pollinators: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3052591/








[16] AGNIR/ICNIRP standards discredited: https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/reveh.2016.31.issue-4/reveh-2016-0060/reveh-2016-0060.pdf




[17] ICNIRP safety levels orders of magnitude too high: http://phiremedical.org/safety-limits-and-political-conflicts-of-interest/



[18] Regulatory capture by industry: http://www.avaate.org/IMG/pdf/escrito_web_icnirp_ingles_final.pdf


[19] Lloyds Insurers Refuse to Cover 5G Wi-Fi Illnesses:



Swiss Re. Concerns Over 5G Health & Other Risks:




[20] 248 EMF scientists & medical doctors from 42 nations: http://www.5gappeal.eu/




[21] Brussels stops go ahead of 5g – Brussels Times article:


Bay Area city blocks 5G deployments over cancer concerns:



[22] Council of Europe Resolution 1815: https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=17994


[23] The First Report of 5G Injury from Switzerland:


New Hampshire Bill to monitor 5G safety:


Netherlands wants research before 5G network:



[24] Dr Martin L Pall (“5G stupidest idea” and some of his research):





[25] Universal Declaration of Human Rights: https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/


UN staff member Claire Edwards points out large scale roll out regardless of proper safety testing



FOI – What do They Know – 5G:




Adrian Price

Truth Activist–Software Engineer–etc.

   (01903) 206641

phone-mobile-16(07958) 628630



“tenax propositi ulteriora peto”

“qui tacet consentire videtur”


This email has been scanned by BullGuard antivirus protection.
For more info visit www.bullguard.com